The Impact of African Diplomacy in Global Politics: Where Does Liberia Stand?

In their brilliant researches and publications: “The Politics of Diplomacy” and “The Art Diplomacy”, the two American statesmen and former Secretaries of State, Mr. James A. Baker and Dr. Henry Kissinger took modern diplomacy to a higher level through their unique works, ideas, presentations and voices. The two illustrious, Baker and Kissinger, admired and described by many renowned diplomats and scholars as the leaders of negotiations and foreign policymakers, have provided a fascinating account of diplomacy in the contemporary world.

As Secretary of State, Baker became cardinal key to bringing the Cold War in for a soft landing by working alongside the former president of the then USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev and the former de facto leader of Soviet Georgia, Eduard Shevardnadze to maintain stability in Eastern Europe. Almost simultaneously, he put together the unprecedented coalition of nations that fought the first Gulf War. On the heels of that success, he organized the Madrid Peace Conference that brought Arab nations and Israel to the peace table for the first time in modern history.

While Henry Kissinger stands out as the dominant American statesman and foreign policymaker of the late 20th century. With his intellectual prowess and tough, skillful negotiating style, Kissinger ended the Vietnam War and greatly improved American relations with its former two primary Cold War enemies, China and the Soviet Union, now Russia.

This article written from the view of an analytical and empirical analysis of international relations, discusses three key issues, which among others, include the failures of African diplomats on the global stage of negotiations and crises management, depth into comparative analysis of foreign policy, discusses contemporary diplomatic practices and concludes with the reviews of modern international relations, in the context of African diplomacy.

As societies develop, new scenarios and equations arise in international relations and the formulation of foreign policy with very little concerns about insufficiency on Africa. Studies have shown that much quantitative analyses in international relations exclude Africa because unavailability of reliable information about the African’s di[lpmacy, particularly due to the failure of African diplomats to impact the world. The initial conceptual problems are reduced to four specific areas which are discussed in this article.

The current system of diplomatic relations has managed to adapt traditional core functions to contemporary requirements, supported by the modern international affairs. One of the most important functions of diplomatic mission is the protection of state’s interests that it represents and of its nationals-residents in the receiving State.

In his acclaimed book title: the Politics of Diplomacy, the former Secretary of State, James A. Baker revealed that the international prestige of any country depends increasingly on the consistency of its foreign policy, international relations and the effectiveness of its officials in the Foreign Service, particularly their loyalty and their ability and talents to safeguard and promote the interests of their nation.

It is clear that a thorough knowledge of international relations coupled with prudence and consistency also generates authority and the necessary strength to defend the interests of their states. Since new international relations call for a multidisciplinary approach to address contemporary challenges where coordination problems require diplomacy and strategy underpinned by internal consensus, much are expected of those on the frontline to protect their countries’ images.

In his thesis on modern diplomacy, former Secretary Baker further explained that an effective diplomacy requires clear and precise goals, in addition to the skillful use of modern means of communication and objective perception of the current international issues. In practical terms, for a diplomat to perform his tasks properly, the individual should be properly informed about the state of relations between the State he represents and the receiving State and the results his State intends to derive from such relationships as a whole.

Without a duly established professional diplomacy, the diplomatic staff of a foreign mission tends to be an unpredictable diversity, with obvious consequences. These include the limited ability to effectively take advantage of opportunities and to adequately address the risks posed by the new international environment. The philosophical changes in international relations, evident in its orientation, design and implementation, are often the result of the speed and intensity of changes from the globalization process and the increasing inclusion and participation of world leaders. The multiplicity of simultaneous and different fora of negotiation in the international arena is another contributing factor for the deep changes in international relations.

For a Ghanaian retired diplomat and statesman, Michael Anda, in his book titled “Contemporary Diplomacy in Africa”, argued that if diplomatic functions are to be conducted properly, African diplomats should be visible in their assignments and must be credible spokesmen for their countries’ foreign policy interests.

In his admired work, Anda detailed that some of these African Missions do not perform demanding diplomatic tasks sufficiently and effectively, most often taking a back seats during major occasions, while their colleagues meanly from the United States, Europe and Asia become visible at major conferences or summits. Their failures, he said to make an impact at these gathering may not be intentional but the inability of most of these African diplomats to read and conduct research, while inferiority has a great part to play.

He further argued that it is clear that the deficiency of African diplomats include serious weaknesses such as unqualified, incompetent, and above all the failures to, for most of them, take their responsibilities very seriously, while the appointment of politicians and others with no experience, knowledge, education and training in international relations and diplomacy.

While there are other African diplomats with unique education and respectable characters, some are either elementary or high school dropped out but managed to beat the system fraudulently to get appointed by forging their credentials to reach this level while others in some instances have to bribe in return for preferential treatment.

This incompetency came to light in 2013 when a certain flamboyant ambassador was quizzed by a group of students during a certain occasion. I was embarrassed that I wished the grounds that I was standing would open so that I could have plunged beneath and disappeared. The diplomat couldn’t distinguish foreign policy from international relations and the new world order on one hand and the doctrines of President Obama and former president George W. Bush on the order hand.

On the stage, this guy became a laughing-showcase and not far from being ‘dumb-ridden cattle among his peers and the students. For every time he tries to escape the question, he was reminded to address the students’ questions and provide answer. After his ineptness became broad, and vivid, the monitor requested the students to give the ambassador breathing space. The intervention of the monitor was geared towards rescuing the trapped ambassador from further exposing his ignorance in the global art and craft of diplomacy.

Other factor responsible for the low productivity of African diplomacy is the serious issue of diplomats negotiating which missions to be assigned, instead of getting posted to counties by those with the appointing powers. It is common for these so-called influential diplomats to lobby for posting to prestigious diplomatic missions in Europe, Asia, America and multilateral organizations, as greater numbers are not willing to be posted to African missions, especially the underdeveloped ones.

Another problem of concern is the existence of too many diplomatic missions abroad, which places a heavy financial burden on the scarce resources of these poor African Countries, decisively maintaining more contacts with non-African states. Studies have shown that Washington, Paris, London or Beijing wouldn’t post diplomats to countries of their choice or where diplomats do not have command over the language of the host state. In the words of Warren Christopher, diplomat is a crisis manager and must possess: A good knowledge of international relations, a good understanding of how international relations function between states.

This is another major deficiency for African countries which post diplomats to countries without being acknowledged of the host state’s language. The smart ones take less time to learn the language while others spent years without being able to communicate through the medium of both spoken and written language of the host state.

Let me remind those at the topic of decision making that the use of effective communication is important in diplomacy as such, understanding the host country’s language is not just key in the process rather a profound added advantage. In order for a Foreign Service officer especially an ambassador to gain respect on the global stage, one appointed as ambassador should have a taste and desire to seek new knowledge by reading and conducting research; must be cognoscente that contemporary diplomacy goes beyond curtails red wine and swanky banquets.

Others may argued that interpreter or translator will play to key role in the process, but let us not forget that the interpreter will not always say the precise words-either there will be addition or reduction in the interpretation. While some are very good in interpretation, others do not have the academic intellect and are educational weaklings or dwarfs to meet up with the demanding tasks that go with the job but will seek for the job solely to make their living at

the detriment of these countries.

Although developing countries far out-numbered fully industrialized states, they are often neglected in the study of international relations, especially with respect to the development of foreign policy theory. International Relations in Contemporary Africa attempts to fill this void in the literature on comparative international relations while at the same time providing a detailed analysis of the economic development and integration.

In contemporary diplomacy, the issues of economic interests, trade, protection of nationals, and security have become much more difficult, with major challenges affecting the practices of diplomacy being influenced by major actors and powerful states, and some time the continued experiment of global, continental and regional groupings. Other factors such as bad political decisions in domestic politics, economic growth, and technological development, among others have greatly affected African diplomacy.

Vividly I can remember the famous words of my professor during my studies in Paris, France when he stressed that diplomat should be fully aware of every day work and new profound changes in international relations and be able to partner major institutions and multi-million companies in host country to enhance economic growth back home in his country.

That is why those tasked with economic and political activities at embassies must be sharp, cognizant of global prevailing wheeling and dealing; keep check of the financial and political movers and shakers, be well-schooled and knowledgeable of dynamics of economic diplomacy which encourages greater cooperation and relations that protects investment and bilateral ties between two states or among companies.

Former American Secretary of State, Madeleine K. Albright in her book: New American Diplomacy, (2000), pinpointed that Diplomacy is the art and practice of negotiation between nations, conducted mostly through private conversations and the exchange of confidential documents. While it is true that a diplomat especial ambassador may not always tell the truth, but to be effective the diplomat must be credible to attract the confidence of the government to which he is accredited and be a person of high esteem with unquestionable integrity.

A diplomat, according to acceptable practices, should be acknowledgeable of other states, regions, and of the mechanisms and procedures of international intercourse which involves a deep knowledge of the world network of diplomatic missions and consular posts, their functions, their practice and structure. As an added advantage, a diplomat should be crafty in crisis management and damage control and as far as possible without surrender, be well-rounded in performance.

A diplomat should also possess specialist qualities such as: political awareness, economic and trade knowledge, personal acceptability, education, intellectual curiosity and intellectual versatility, and not just sit and wait to be teleguided. A diplomat should level up fully to the new trends of diplomatic behavior and challenge should not come as a surprise, but for others it does, taking into consideration contemporary complexities of the international system, in which a multiplicity of major actors operates, which demand new approaches and solutions for a new demanding challenges.

In order for a Foreign Service officer including ambassador to gain respect on the global stage, one appointed to a key diplomatic post should have taste and desire to seek new knowledge by reading and conducting research about the host country; must be cognoscente that contemporary diplomacy goes beyond curtails red wine, swanky banquets and money making business to enrich himself and family against the greater good of the sending country .

#JosephusMosesGray